Skip to Content

Analyzing Warrants And Claims

Analyzing Warrants And Claims

Submitted by • October 10, 2013

This claim fails because there is no supportive evidence to this claim to justify a warrant. The claim could hold water if there is enough and substantial evidence explaining or proving the claim. What thing is being investigated against President Obama? Since there is no clear support of this claim; hence there is not vivid warrant for this claim.

Voted by:
Voted by kallen

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>